The U.S. government has been slow to renew its major support for quantum computing (QC) but will get to it eventually. Publicly traded QC companies are disappointing except for IonQ. And AI rules the minds of venture capitalists as well as company CTOs.
Some of the key themes in the spring Market Update were the U.S. government’s support for quantum computing, the stock market performance of pure-play companies, VC funding for quantum and the effects of AI on the quantum market. We revisit and update these topics below.
The need for the United States to continue investing in quantum technologies – and, pointedly, to stay ahead of China in quantum – is one of the areas that Republicans and Democrats agree on. While there are calls for the new Republican government to considerably reduce government spending in 2025, quantum is not an area that will see the first cost cutting.
The National Quantum Initiative (NQI) is a program for quantum tech research funding passed during Donald Trump’s previous presidency in 2018. Its funding appropriations expired in 2023. The NQI is very important for the U.S. quantum ecosystem, being the main source of funding outside of the Department of Defense. This obviously matters for researchers but also for companies and much of the money is used for competitive contracts. As an example, Rigetti’s CEO Kulkarni said during their Q3 earnings call that the NQI is "critical for our funding in 2025 and the next few years."
The National Quantum Initiative Reauthorization Act has not become law yet and most likely will have to be re-introduced by the newly elected House of Representatives next year. The current bill would fund quantum efforts by four major agencies to the tune of $1.8 billion during 2025-2029. About half of that would go to the Department of Energy (DOE), over $600 million to the National Science Foundation, and the rest to NIST and NASA. There is a related bill in the Senate, DOE Quantum Leadership Act of 2024, to amend the original NQI and raise the stakes by further increasing funding at the Department of Energy by more than $1 billion in 2025-2029.
For Finnish quantum computing companies existing and future R&D collaboration with the U.S. should remain relevant. In addition to gaining access to knowledge, it will also help with market understanding and in creation of networks for the future.
There are four companies publicly traded in the U.S. that we can look to for some information on how financial markets view quantum computing companies.
Legend:
NASX – Nasdaq Composite Index
IONQ – IonQ
RGTI – Rigetti Computing, Inc.
QBTS – D-Wave Quantum Systems Inc.
QUBT – Quantum Computing Inc.
The 3-year graph shows that one company, IonQ, is a star within this group. I’ll briefly go through the latest performance of three of these companies:
A few other general observations from these companies:
It seems that venture capital in the U.S. will have a similar year in 2024 as in 2023 in terms of total deal value (perhaps around (around $175 billion) and deal count (around 15000 deals). These figures are similar to the numbers in 2020, before the over-heating and then inflation-induced cooldown in 2021 and 2022.
What these figures hide is the extreme interest in Artificial Intelligence, with funding chasing AI deals. Especially the value figure is inflated by extremely high valuations for specific AI companies.
The timing remains poor for raising funds for non-AI companies, but many U.S. startups are seeing the bottom of their cash coffers and must either raise funds or die. M&A activity remains very small as well.
Pushing AI-related aspects of quantum computing makes perfect sense in this environment. For example, D-Wave unveiled a new product development roadmap focused on addressing AI/ML workloads. But Zapata shows that AI is not always a savior, either. The re-branding of Zapata Computing was one of the topics in our March webinar as they were just about to go public via a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC).
Zapata AI ceased operations in early October 2024. The company is gone. Unfortunately, the process did not provide sufficient funds for the company – they netted a mere $4.5 million from the whole deal while incurring additional costs for professional services in the millions of dollars.
Interested in developing global growth business from quantum computing?